Baseten vs General Compute
Baseten leads on time to first token with OpenAI and Anthropic-compatible APIs. General Compute targets decode speed on ASICs.
By The Subconscious Team · Updated
Baseten vs General Compute: key differences
Baseten posted the lowest time to first token on the Artificial Analysis board in August 2026, 0.49 seconds, and serves about a dozen open models including GLM 5.3, Kimi K3 and gpt-oss 120B over endpoints that speak both OpenAI and Anthropic formats. Dedicated deployments run any Truss-packaged model, with an H100 at about $6.50 an hour. General Compute pairs GPU prefill with ASIC decode and reports over 1,000 tokens per second on GPT-OSS 120B in its own benchmark. Its API is OpenAI-only and serves four models at $0.21 to $0.28 in per million tokens.
Baseten is the pick when first-token latency, Anthropic-format compatibility or custom non-LLM models matter. General Compute fits workloads where output length sets the wait, since its pitch is decode throughput. Both host custom fine-tunes. Baseten runs them on GPUs you choose, and General Compute runs them behind a private model ID on its mixed hardware.
What Baseten and General Compute do
Baseten
Baseten runs two products. Model APIs serve a curated set of about a dozen open models, including GLM 5.3, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813, Kimi K3 and gpt-oss 120B, over endpoints that speak both the OpenAI Chat Completions shape and the Anthropic Messages shape. That dual compatibility means an existing OpenAI or Claude SDK, or a coding agent, points at Baseten with a base URL change. Dedicated deployments take any model you package with the open-source Truss CLI and bill per GPU minute, with an H100 at about $6.50 an hour.
Example models: GLM 5.3, gpt-oss 120B
Full Baseten profileGeneral Compute
General Compute is a San Francisco inference cloud built on alternative chips. It splits each request across hardware, with NVIDIA GPUs handling prefill and ASICs from Cerebras, SambaNova, Positron AI and d-Matrix handling decode. In its own open benchmark on GPT-OSS 120B it measured 1,025 to 1,234 output tokens per second against 100 to 121 on an unnamed GPU cloud, and up to 16.2x faster end to end. Founders Finn Puklowski and Jason Goodison raised a $15M seed led by FUSE, an up to $400M debt facility from Upper90 and, on October 27, 2026, a $100M Series A co-led by Blackbird and Abstract.
Example models: MiniMax M2.7, DeepSeek V3.2, GPT-OSS 120B
Full General Compute profileShould you choose Baseten or General Compute?
Baseten
Choose Baseten for
- Lowest time to first token
- Claude SDKs and coding agents via Anthropic format
- Custom speech and embedding models
General Compute
Choose General Compute for
- High decode throughput
- Cheap GPT-OSS 120B
- Dedicated capacity with throughput SLAs
Baseten vs General Compute at a glance
| Attribute | ||
|---|---|---|
| Model access | Open weights, about a dozen curated | Open weights |
| Flagship models | GLM 5.3, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, Kimi K3, gpt-oss 120B | MiniMax M2.7, DeepSeek V3.2, GPT-OSS 120B |
| Speed | 0.49s TTFT, lowest measured | 1,000+ tok/s on GPT-OSS 120B (vendor) |
| Price | H100 about $6.50/hr dedicated | $0.21–$0.28 in, $0.38–$1.20 out per 1M |
| Customization | Deploy any model with Truss | Custom LoRA and fine-tuned checkpoints |
| Deployment | Model APIs, dedicated, self-host | Serverless API, dedicated racks, bare metal |
| Long context | Varies by model | 192K (MiniMax M2.7) |
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Baseten and General Compute?
Baseten leads on time to first token with OpenAI and Anthropic-compatible APIs. General Compute targets decode speed on ASICs.
When should I choose Baseten over General Compute?
Lowest time to first token; Claude SDKs and coding agents via Anthropic format; Custom speech and embedding models.
When should I choose General Compute over Baseten?
High decode throughput; Cheap GPT-OSS 120B; Dedicated capacity with throughput SLAs.
Is Baseten or General Compute cheaper?
Baseten: H100 about $6.50/hr dedicated. General Compute: $0.21–$0.28 in, $0.38–$1.20 out per 1M. The cheaper choice depends on the model and workload.
Which has more context, Baseten or General Compute?
Baseten: Varies by model. General Compute: 192K (MiniMax M2.7).
Related comparisons
Subconscious vs Baseten
OpenAI vs Baseten
Anthropic vs Baseten
Google Vertex AI vs Baseten
Amazon Bedrock vs Baseten
Together AI vs Baseten
Subconscious vs General Compute
OpenAI vs General Compute
Anthropic vs General Compute
Google Vertex AI vs General Compute
Amazon Bedrock vs General Compute
Together AI vs General Compute
Running long-horizon agents?
If your agents run past 200K tokens, compare both against Subconscious. Our inference stack treats a long-horizon trace as the primary workload, so speed, cost, and accuracy hold up deep into the trace.