Every major inference provider, compared.

What each provider does, where it wins, and how it stacks up on the dimensions that decide a production workload.

Browse all comparisons

Subconscious

Excellent speed, cost, and accuracy on tasks that need 200k+ tokens.

Frequently asked questions

What is an AI inference provider?

An inference provider runs AI models for you and sells access by the token, the GPU hour or the request. Some are labs selling their own closed models (OpenAI, Anthropic, xAI), some are clouds hosting open-weight models (Together AI, Fireworks AI, Baseten, DeepInfra), some run custom chips for speed (Groq, Cerebras, SambaNova), and some are hyperscaler platforms (Amazon Bedrock, Google Vertex AI).

Which inference provider is the fastest?

Cerebras posts the fastest published output speed of any public host, near 3,000 tokens per second on GPT-OSS 120B. Groq serves 500 to 1,000 tokens per second with tight tail latency, and Baseten posted the lowest measured time to first token among the major open-model hosts at 0.49 seconds.

Which inference provider is the cheapest?

DeepInfra is the price floor for open-model inference, with small models from $0.02 per million tokens. Sail Research is cheaper still for work that can wait, at 30 to 80% off in exchange for minutes-long turns, and DeepSeek’s own API halves its prices off-peak.

Which inference provider is best for long-context and long-horizon agents?

Subconscious is built for agent traces past 200K tokens. It prunes the KV cache instead of rereading context, and against standard open-model inference it delivers 2x faster task completion, a 5M+ effective context window, and 50% to 80% lower cost. Anthropic offers a 1M window with no surcharge past 200K, while OpenAI and xAI charge more once prompts pass 272K and 200K tokens.

Which inference provider is best for fine-tuning open models?

Together AI covers LoRA and full-parameter SFT with reinforcement learning in beta, and serves the checkpoint on the same platform. Fireworks AI offers SFT, DPO and reinforcement fine-tuning, and serves fine-tuned models at the base model’s per-token price.

Which inference provider is best for image and video generation?

fal hosts 1,000+ image, video and audio models behind one API with billing that skips failures and cold starts. Runware competes on price per generation across image, video, audio and 3D with one request schema for every modality.

How we compare providers

Profiles draw on each provider’s own docs and pricing pages plus third-party reviews and benchmarks, linked as sources on every profile. Subconscious is one of the providers compared, so each head-to-head also says where the other side wins. Pricing and model lineups change often; treat figures as a snapshot from the date above.

By The Subconscious Team · Updated