Moonshot AI

The lab behind Kimi K3, the most capable open-weight model, with 1M context.

Founded
2023
Example models
Kimi K3, Kimi K2.6

By The Subconscious Team · Updated

What is Moonshot AI?

Moonshot AI is the Beijing lab behind the Kimi models. Its flagship Kimi K3 launched July 16, 2026 as a 2.8 trillion parameter mixture-of-experts model that activates 16 of 896 experts per token, with native vision and a 1M token context. It is the first open model in the 3T class, and full weights landed on Hugging Face on July 27. The hosted API costs $3 in and $15 out per million tokens, with cached input at $0.30, and it runs through an OpenAI-compatible endpoint, Kimi Code in the terminal, OpenRouter and Cloudflare Workers AI.

Independent testers mostly confirmed Moonshot's claims. Vals AI scored K3 at 93.4% on SWE-bench Verified with a neutral harness, fourth overall behind Claude Opus 5, GPT-5.6 Sol and Claude Fable 5. Artificial Analysis placed it third on its Intelligence Index. The catch is speed and verbosity: it always thinks, and it runs around 33 tokens per second. Demand overran Moonshot's GPUs within days of launch, and new API subscriptions paused on July 19 before reopening in batches. The cheaper Kimi K2.6 remains available at $0.95 in and $4 out.

Moonshot AI pros, cons and use cases

Upsides

  • Most capable open-weight model, near closed frontier coding scores at a lower price.
  • Very large context and strong cache discounts for repo-scale agents.

Core use cases

  • Long-horizon coding on huge repositories.
  • Document-heavy research and visual agent work that needs 1M context.

Downsides

  • Slow and verbose, and self-hosting takes a 64+ accelerator cluster.
  • The custom license adds a commercial agreement above $20M in hosting revenue and a branding clause at large scale.

Moonshot AI alternatives compared

Pick any row for the full head-to-head.

ProviderModel accessFlagship modelsSpeedPriceCustomizationDeploymentLong contextCompare
Moonshot AIOpen weights, custom licenseKimi K3, Kimi K2.6~33 tok/s on Kimi K3$3 in, $15 out (Kimi K3)Open weights to fine-tuneAPI, Kimi Code, OpenRouter1M
SubconsciousOpen weightsGLM 5.3, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash2x faster task completion50–80% lower cost; billed on processed tokensMarathon post-trained variantsManaged API, dedicated, on-prem5M+ effective contextCompare
OpenAIClosed, plus open gpt-ossGPT-6 Astra, GPT-5.6 Sol, Terra, LunaFast mode: up to 2.5x at 2x price$0.20–$10 in, $1.20–$50 out per 1MN/AAPI, Azure OpenAI, Bedrock1.05M; 2x input past 272KCompare
AnthropicClosedClaude Fable 5.1, Opus, Sonnet, Haiku 4.5Fable is the slowest tier$1–$10 in, $5–$50 out per 1MN/AAPI, Bedrock, Vertex AI, Microsoft Foundry1M, no surcharge past 200KCompare
Google Vertex AIClosed and open, 200+ modelsGemini 3.8 Flash, Claude, GemmaFlash tier built for low latencyGemini 3.8 Flash $0.75 in, $3.75 outCustom training on GPUs or TPUsManaged on Google Cloud1M on Gemini 3.8 FlashCompare
Amazon BedrockClosed and open, 100+ modelsClaude, GPT-6 Astra, Nova, DeepSeekLatency-optimized option on some models~20–35% above direct; Claude at parityFine-tuning, Custom Model ImportManaged on AWS, AgentCoreVaries by modelCompare
Together AIOpen weightsKimi K3, DeepSeek V4, GLM 5.2, Qwen 3.80.99s TTFT on DeepSeek V4 ProParity with Fireworks and BasetenLoRA and full SFT; RL in betaServerless, dedicated, GPU clusters512K on DeepSeek V4 ProCompare
Fireworks AIOpen weightsDeepSeek V4 Pro, Kimi K3167–174 tok/s on DeepSeek V4 ProFine-tunes served at base priceSFT, DPO, RFT; Training APIServerless, dedicated GPUsFull 1M on DeepSeek V4 ProCompare
BasetenOpen weights, 13 curatedGLM 5.2, DeepSeek V4, Kimi K3, gpt-oss 120B0.49s TTFT, lowest measuredH100 about $6.50/hr dedicatedDeploy any model with TrussModel APIs, dedicated, self-hostVaries by modelCompare
GroqOpen weightsGPT-OSS 120B, Qwen 3.6 27B500–1,000 tok/sNear the floor on small modelsNo fine-tuned model hostingGroqCloud APIAround 131K maxCompare
CerebrasOpen weightsGPT-OSS 120B, Gemma 4 31B~3,000 tok/s on GPT-OSS 120B$0.35 in, $0.75 out (GPT-OSS 120B)UnknownShared API, dedicated, partnersUnknownCompare
DeepInfraOpen weightsDeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 3.1 8B~33 tok/s on DeepSeek V4 Pro (FP4)From $0.02 per 1MNo managed fine-tuningShared API, no contracts66K on FP4 DeepSeek V4 ProCompare
ModalBring your own weightsNone hosted~1s container bootPer second; H100 $3.95/hr listRun any training codeServerless GPU containersDepends on the model you deployCompare
xAIClosedGrok 4.6, Grok 4.20, grok-build~54 tok/s on Grok 4.6$2 in, $6 out (Grok 4.6); 2x past 200KUnknownFirst-party API500K (4.6), 1M (4.20, 4.3)Compare
DeepSeekOpen weights (MIT)DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, V4 Pro~35 tok/s on V4 ProOff-peak hours at half priceOpen weights to fine-tuneFirst-party API, Hugging Face weights1M, 384K max outputCompare
Z.aiOpen weights (MIT)GLM-5.3, GLM-5.3-Flash~80 tok/s on GLM-5.3$1.40 in, $4.40 out (GLM-5.3); free Flash tierOpen weights, no license limitsAPI, GLM Coding Plan1M (GLM-5.3)Compare
Alibaba CloudClosed Max; open smaller QwenQwen 3.8-Max, Qwen 3.7-Max~40 tok/s on Qwen 3.8-Max$2 in, $6 out internationalNo fine-tuning on MaxModel Studio on Alibaba Cloud1M (Qwen 3.8-Max)Compare
MetaClosed API; open Muse GlimmerMuse Spark 1.3, Muse Glimmer~145–233 tok/s on Muse Spark 1.3$1.25 in, $4.25 out; Contributor tier cheaperOpen Muse Glimmer weights to fine-tuneMeta Model API (preview)1MCompare
SambaNovaOpen weightsMiniMax M2.7, GPT-OSS 120B, DeepSeek~820 tok/s on MiniMax M2.7 (SN50)$0.22 in, $0.59 out (GPT-OSS 120B)UnknownSambaCloud, racks for neocloudsUp to 192K (MiniMax M2.7)Compare
NebiusOpen weights, 60+ modelsDeepSeek, Qwen, GLM, Kimi, GPT-OSSAmong top hosts on throughputFrom $0.06 per 1M inputServe uploaded fine-tunesToken Factory, dedicated, raw GPUsVaries by modelCompare
falHosted media modelsFLUX, Kling, SeedreamCold starts on less popular endpointsPer image, per video second, GPU timeLoRA training endpointsHosted API, serverless GPUsNot applicableCompare
Novita AIOpen weightsDeepSeek V4 Pro, Gemma 4~36 tok/s on DeepSeek V4 ProFrom $0.02 per 1M; batch 50% offHot-swappable LoRA adaptersServerless, GPU cloud, dedicatedFull 1M on DeepSeek V4 ProCompare
ParasailAny Hugging Face modelGTE-Qwen2, Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct600ms p99 real-time budgetPer-parameter rates; batch 50% offPrivate Hugging Face reposServerless, elastic, dedicated, batchVaries by modelCompare
Inference.netOpen, closed and customCustomer fine-tunesBatch windows of 24h to 7 daysDiscounted spare GPU capacityDistill traces into custom modelsBatch API, gateway, dedicated GPUsVaries by modelCompare
GMI CloudOpen and third-party modelsGLM-4.7-Flash, Google VeoNear bare-metal performance$0.07 in, $0.40 out (GLM-4.7-Flash)UnknownShared, autoscaling, reserved GPUsVaries by modelCompare
Sail ResearchOpen weightsKimi K2.6, GLM-5, GPT-OSS 120BMinutes per turn by design30–80% off by completion windowCustomer LoRA fine-tunesAPI plus SailboxesVaries by modelCompare
MorphSpecialist modelsmorph-v3-fast, morph-v3-large10,500+ tok/s Fast Apply~40% fewer tokens than full rewritesFine-tuning offeredOpenAI-compatible APIUnknownCompare
RelaceSpecialist modelsrelace-apply-3, agentic search~10,000 tok/s apply3x+ cheaper than full rewritesUnknownHosted API or self-hosted128K maxCompare
TypeSafe AIDecision modelsJev, jev-1.13~100ms per callA fraction of an LLM callUnknownEarly-access APIUnknownCompare
StepFunOpen (Apache 2.0) and API modelsStep 3.7 Flash, Step3~128 tok/s on Step 3.7 Flash$0.20 in, $1.15 out (Step 3.7 Flash)Open weights to fine-tuneFirst-party API, OpenRouter256KCompare
RunwareHosted media modelsSeedance 2.5, Qwen-Image-3.0UnknownImages from fractions of a centFine-tuned diffusion checkpointsUnified API, raw GPUsNot applicableCompare
StreamLakeProprietary coding modelsKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5, KAT-Coder-AirUnknownPer token or KwaiKAT Coding PlanUnknownMaaS API, bare metalUnknownCompare
WaferOpen weightsQwen 3.5 397B Turbo, GLM 5.1 Turbo2–2.8x vs stock vLLM or SGLangWafer Pass from $10 a weekAgent-tuned dedicated deploymentsServerless pass, dedicatedVaries by modelCompare
RunInfraOpen weightsNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B, Qwen 3.8 27BCold starts under 2sCoding plans from $10 a monthUploads up to 50 GB; auto-quantizationModel APIs, agent-built endpointsVaries by modelCompare
Particle.AIOpen weightsDeepSeek V4.1 Flash, GLM 5.3 Flash~157 tok/s on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.10 in, $0.40 out (GLM 5.3 Flash)UnknownVia Vercel AI Gateway1MCompare

Frequently asked questions

What is Moonshot AI?

Moonshot AI is the Beijing lab behind the Kimi models. Its flagship Kimi K3 launched July 16, 2026 as a 2.8 trillion parameter mixture-of-experts model that activates 16 of 896 experts per token, with native vision and a 1M token context. It is the first open model in the 3T class, and full weights landed on Hugging Face on July 27. The hosted API costs $3 in and $15 out per million tokens, with cached input at $0.30, and it runs through an OpenAI-compatible endpoint, Kimi Code in the terminal, OpenRouter and Cloudflare Workers AI.

What is Moonshot AI best for?

Long-horizon coding on huge repositories; Document-heavy research and visual agent work that needs 1M context.

How much does Moonshot AI cost?

Moonshot AI pricing at a glance: $3 in, $15 out (Kimi K3). Rates change often, so check Moonshot AI's pricing page before committing.

How much context does Moonshot AI support?

Moonshot AI's long-context support: 1M.

What are the downsides of Moonshot AI?

Slow and verbose, and self-hosting takes a 64+ accelerator cluster; The custom license adds a commercial agreement above $20M in hosting revenue and a branding clause at large scale.

What are the best alternatives to Moonshot AI?

Common alternatives include Subconscious, OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Vertex AI, Amazon Bedrock. Each has a head-to-head comparison with Moonshot AI on this site.

Sources: Kimi K3 full review, Omniscient, Kimi K3 guide, WhatLLM, Kimi K3 open weights, Nerova. Pricing and model lineups change often; figures are a snapshot.