Anthropic
Closed Claude models known for agentic coding, with 1M context and no long-context premium.
- Founded
- 2021
- Example models
- Claude Fable 5.1, Claude Haiku 4.5
By The Subconscious Team · Updated
What is Anthropic?
Anthropic sells the Claude family of closed models through its own API, Amazon Bedrock, Google Vertex AI and Microsoft Foundry. The public lineup today runs from Claude Fable 5.1 at the top, released September 1, 2026, through the Opus and Sonnet tiers down to Haiku 4.5. List prices span a tenfold range, from $10 in and $50 out on Fable to $1 in and $5 out on Haiku. The top three tiers include a 1M token context window at standard pricing with no surcharge past 200K.
Claude built its reputation on agentic coding, and Claude Code made it the default model inside many engineering teams. Fable 5.1 targets long unattended runs that have to check their own progress, and Anthropic cut its cache read price to $0.25 per million, which matters a lot for agent loops that reread the same prefix every turn. Adaptive thinking lets the model pick how hard to reason per step, steered by an effort parameter. Batch takes 50% off every model.
Anthropic pros, cons and use cases
Upsides
- Top-tier results on real-world coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Pro.
- Full 1M context on the larger models with no long-context premium.
- Cheap cache reads on Fable 5.1 help long-horizon agents.
- Same models on every major cloud, which eases enterprise procurement.
Core use cases
- Agentic coding and code review.
- Long-running research agents and multi-step enterprise workflows.
Downsides
- Fable always thinks, so output tokens per task run high and latency is the slowest in the lineup.
- Safety classifiers can reroute cybersecurity or biology requests to a lower tier, which surprises some security teams.
Anthropic alternatives compared
Pick any row for the full head-to-head.
| Provider | Model access | Flagship models | Speed | Price | Customization | Deployment | Long context | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Closed | Claude Fable 5.1, Opus, Sonnet, Haiku 4.5 | Fable is the slowest tier | $1–$10 in, $5–$50 out per 1M | N/A | API, Bedrock, Vertex AI, Microsoft Foundry | 1M, no surcharge past 200K | ||
| Open weights | GLM 5.3, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 2x faster task completion | 50–80% lower cost; billed on processed tokens | Marathon post-trained variants | Managed API, dedicated, on-prem | 5M+ effective context | Compare | |
| Closed, plus open gpt-oss | GPT-6 Astra, GPT-5.6 Sol, Terra, Luna | Fast mode: up to 2.5x at 2x price | $0.20–$10 in, $1.20–$50 out per 1M | N/A | API, Azure OpenAI, Bedrock | 1.05M; 2x input past 272K | Compare | |
| Closed and open, 200+ models | Gemini 3.8 Flash, Claude, Gemma | Flash tier built for low latency | Gemini 3.8 Flash $0.75 in, $3.75 out | Custom training on GPUs or TPUs | Managed on Google Cloud | 1M on Gemini 3.8 Flash | Compare | |
| Closed and open, 100+ models | Claude, GPT-6 Astra, Nova, DeepSeek | Latency-optimized option on some models | ~20–35% above direct; Claude at parity | Fine-tuning, Custom Model Import | Managed on AWS, AgentCore | Varies by model | Compare | |
| Open weights | Kimi K3, DeepSeek V4, GLM 5.2, Qwen 3.8 | 0.99s TTFT on DeepSeek V4 Pro | Parity with Fireworks and Baseten | LoRA and full SFT; RL in beta | Serverless, dedicated, GPU clusters | 512K on DeepSeek V4 Pro | Compare | |
| Open weights | DeepSeek V4 Pro, Kimi K3 | 167–174 tok/s on DeepSeek V4 Pro | Fine-tunes served at base price | SFT, DPO, RFT; Training API | Serverless, dedicated GPUs | Full 1M on DeepSeek V4 Pro | Compare | |
| Open weights, 13 curated | GLM 5.2, DeepSeek V4, Kimi K3, gpt-oss 120B | 0.49s TTFT, lowest measured | H100 about $6.50/hr dedicated | Deploy any model with Truss | Model APIs, dedicated, self-host | Varies by model | Compare | |
| Open weights | GPT-OSS 120B, Qwen 3.6 27B | 500–1,000 tok/s | Near the floor on small models | No fine-tuned model hosting | GroqCloud API | Around 131K max | Compare | |
| Open weights | GPT-OSS 120B, Gemma 4 31B | ~3,000 tok/s on GPT-OSS 120B | $0.35 in, $0.75 out (GPT-OSS 120B) | Unknown | Shared API, dedicated, partners | Unknown | Compare | |
| Open weights | DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 3.1 8B | ~33 tok/s on DeepSeek V4 Pro (FP4) | From $0.02 per 1M | No managed fine-tuning | Shared API, no contracts | 66K on FP4 DeepSeek V4 Pro | Compare | |
| Bring your own weights | None hosted | ~1s container boot | Per second; H100 $3.95/hr list | Run any training code | Serverless GPU containers | Depends on the model you deploy | Compare | |
| Closed | Grok 4.6, Grok 4.20, grok-build | ~54 tok/s on Grok 4.6 | $2 in, $6 out (Grok 4.6); 2x past 200K | Unknown | First-party API | 500K (4.6), 1M (4.20, 4.3) | Compare | |
| Open weights (MIT) | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, V4 Pro | ~35 tok/s on V4 Pro | Off-peak hours at half price | Open weights to fine-tune | First-party API, Hugging Face weights | 1M, 384K max output | Compare | |
| Open weights, custom license | Kimi K3, Kimi K2.6 | ~33 tok/s on Kimi K3 | $3 in, $15 out (Kimi K3) | Open weights to fine-tune | API, Kimi Code, OpenRouter | 1M | Compare | |
| Open weights (MIT) | GLM-5.3, GLM-5.3-Flash | ~80 tok/s on GLM-5.3 | $1.40 in, $4.40 out (GLM-5.3); free Flash tier | Open weights, no license limits | API, GLM Coding Plan | 1M (GLM-5.3) | Compare | |
| Closed Max; open smaller Qwen | Qwen 3.8-Max, Qwen 3.7-Max | ~40 tok/s on Qwen 3.8-Max | $2 in, $6 out international | No fine-tuning on Max | Model Studio on Alibaba Cloud | 1M (Qwen 3.8-Max) | Compare | |
| Closed API; open Muse Glimmer | Muse Spark 1.3, Muse Glimmer | ~145–233 tok/s on Muse Spark 1.3 | $1.25 in, $4.25 out; Contributor tier cheaper | Open Muse Glimmer weights to fine-tune | Meta Model API (preview) | 1M | Compare | |
| Open weights | MiniMax M2.7, GPT-OSS 120B, DeepSeek | ~820 tok/s on MiniMax M2.7 (SN50) | $0.22 in, $0.59 out (GPT-OSS 120B) | Unknown | SambaCloud, racks for neoclouds | Up to 192K (MiniMax M2.7) | Compare | |
| Open weights, 60+ models | DeepSeek, Qwen, GLM, Kimi, GPT-OSS | Among top hosts on throughput | From $0.06 per 1M input | Serve uploaded fine-tunes | Token Factory, dedicated, raw GPUs | Varies by model | Compare | |
| Hosted media models | FLUX, Kling, Seedream | Cold starts on less popular endpoints | Per image, per video second, GPU time | LoRA training endpoints | Hosted API, serverless GPUs | Not applicable | Compare | |
| Open weights | DeepSeek V4 Pro, Gemma 4 | ~36 tok/s on DeepSeek V4 Pro | From $0.02 per 1M; batch 50% off | Hot-swappable LoRA adapters | Serverless, GPU cloud, dedicated | Full 1M on DeepSeek V4 Pro | Compare | |
| Any Hugging Face model | GTE-Qwen2, Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct | 600ms p99 real-time budget | Per-parameter rates; batch 50% off | Private Hugging Face repos | Serverless, elastic, dedicated, batch | Varies by model | Compare | |
| Open, closed and custom | Customer fine-tunes | Batch windows of 24h to 7 days | Discounted spare GPU capacity | Distill traces into custom models | Batch API, gateway, dedicated GPUs | Varies by model | Compare | |
| Open and third-party models | GLM-4.7-Flash, Google Veo | Near bare-metal performance | $0.07 in, $0.40 out (GLM-4.7-Flash) | Unknown | Shared, autoscaling, reserved GPUs | Varies by model | Compare | |
| Open weights | Kimi K2.6, GLM-5, GPT-OSS 120B | Minutes per turn by design | 30–80% off by completion window | Customer LoRA fine-tunes | API plus Sailboxes | Varies by model | Compare | |
| Specialist models | morph-v3-fast, morph-v3-large | 10,500+ tok/s Fast Apply | ~40% fewer tokens than full rewrites | Fine-tuning offered | OpenAI-compatible API | Unknown | Compare | |
| Specialist models | relace-apply-3, agentic search | ~10,000 tok/s apply | 3x+ cheaper than full rewrites | Unknown | Hosted API or self-hosted | 128K max | Compare | |
| Decision models | Jev, jev-1.13 | ~100ms per call | A fraction of an LLM call | Unknown | Early-access API | Unknown | Compare | |
| Open (Apache 2.0) and API models | Step 3.7 Flash, Step3 | ~128 tok/s on Step 3.7 Flash | $0.20 in, $1.15 out (Step 3.7 Flash) | Open weights to fine-tune | First-party API, OpenRouter | 256K | Compare | |
| Hosted media models | Seedance 2.5, Qwen-Image-3.0 | Unknown | Images from fractions of a cent | Fine-tuned diffusion checkpoints | Unified API, raw GPUs | Not applicable | Compare | |
| Proprietary coding models | KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5, KAT-Coder-Air | Unknown | Per token or KwaiKAT Coding Plan | Unknown | MaaS API, bare metal | Unknown | Compare | |
| Open weights | Qwen 3.5 397B Turbo, GLM 5.1 Turbo | 2–2.8x vs stock vLLM or SGLang | Wafer Pass from $10 a week | Agent-tuned dedicated deployments | Serverless pass, dedicated | Varies by model | Compare | |
| Open weights | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B, Qwen 3.8 27B | Cold starts under 2s | Coding plans from $10 a month | Uploads up to 50 GB; auto-quantization | Model APIs, agent-built endpoints | Varies by model | Compare | |
| Open weights | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, GLM 5.3 Flash | ~157 tok/s on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | $0.10 in, $0.40 out (GLM 5.3 Flash) | Unknown | Via Vercel AI Gateway | 1M | Compare |
Frequently asked questions
What is Anthropic?
Anthropic sells the Claude family of closed models through its own API, Amazon Bedrock, Google Vertex AI and Microsoft Foundry. The public lineup today runs from Claude Fable 5.1 at the top, released September 1, 2026, through the Opus and Sonnet tiers down to Haiku 4.5. List prices span a tenfold range, from $10 in and $50 out on Fable to $1 in and $5 out on Haiku. The top three tiers include a 1M token context window at standard pricing with no surcharge past 200K.
What is Anthropic best for?
Agentic coding and code review; Long-running research agents and multi-step enterprise workflows.
How much does Anthropic cost?
Anthropic pricing at a glance: $1–$10 in, $5–$50 out per 1M. Rates change often, so check Anthropic's pricing page before committing.
How much context does Anthropic support?
Anthropic's long-context support: 1M, no surcharge past 200K.
What are the downsides of Anthropic?
Fable always thinks, so output tokens per task run high and latency is the slowest in the lineup; Safety classifiers can reroute cybersecurity or biology requests to a lower tier, which surprises some security teams.
What are the best alternatives to Anthropic?
Common alternatives include Subconscious, OpenAI, Google Vertex AI, Amazon Bedrock, Together AI. Each has a head-to-head comparison with Anthropic on this site.
Sources: Best Claude model 2026, Respan, Fable 5 vs Sonnet 5, ofox. Pricing and model lineups change often; figures are a snapshot.