Anthropic
Closed Claude models known for agentic coding, with 1M context across the lineup.
- Founded
- 2021
- Example models
- Claude Fable 5.1, Claude Opus 5.5, Claude Haiku 5.5
By The Subconscious Team · Updated
What is Anthropic?
Anthropic sells the Claude family of closed models through its own API, Amazon Bedrock, Google Vertex AI and Microsoft Foundry. The public lineup today runs from Claude Fable 5.1 at the top, released September 1, 2026, through Opus 5.5 ($4 in, $20 out) and Sonnet 5.5 ($2 in, $10 out) down to Haiku 5.5. List prices span a hundredfold range, from $10 in and $50 out on Fable to $0.10 in and $0.50 out on Haiku. All four tiers have a 1M token context window. The top three bill it at standard pricing, while Haiku 5.5 charges more past 100K.
Claude built its reputation on agentic coding, and Claude Code made it the default model inside many engineering teams. Fable 5.1 targets long unattended runs that have to check their own progress, and Opus 5.5 performs at Fable's level on most work for 40% of the price. Cache reads are cheap across the lineup, from $0.25 per million on Fable down to $0.10 on Sonnet 5.5 and $0.01 on Haiku 5.5, which matters a lot for agent loops that reread the same prefix every turn. Adaptive thinking lets the model pick how hard to reason per step, steered by an effort parameter. Batch takes 50% off every model.
Anthropic pros, cons and use cases
Upsides
- Top-tier results on real-world coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Pro.
- Full 1M context on every model, with no long-context premium on Fable, Opus or Sonnet.
- Cheap cache reads across the lineup help long-horizon agents.
- Same models on every major cloud, which eases enterprise procurement.
Core use cases
- Agentic coding and code review.
- Long-running research agents and multi-step enterprise workflows.
Downsides
- Fable always thinks, so output tokens per task run high and latency is the slowest in the lineup.
- Safety classifiers can reroute cybersecurity or biology requests to a lower tier, which surprises some security teams.
Anthropic alternatives compared
Pick any row for the full head-to-head.
| Provider | Model access | Flagship models | Speed | Price | Customization | Deployment | Long context | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthropic | Closed | Claude Fable 5.1, Opus 5.5, Sonnet 5.5, Haiku 5.5 | Fable is the slowest tier | $0.10–$10 in, $0.50–$50 out per 1M | N/A | API, Bedrock, Vertex AI, Microsoft Foundry | 1M; Haiku 5.5 costs more past 100K | |
 Subconscious | Open weights | GLM 5.3, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 2x faster task completion | 50–80% lower cost; billed on processed tokens | Marathon post-trained variants | Managed API, dedicated, on-prem | 5M+ effective context | Compare |
 OpenAI | Closed, plus open gpt-oss | GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6.1 Sol, GPT-6 Luna | Fast mode; Ultrafast on GPT-6 Astra | $0.10–$10 in, $0.50–$50 out per 1M | N/A | API, Azure OpenAI, Bedrock | 1.05M; 2x input past 272K | Compare |
 Google Vertex AI | Closed and open, 200+ models | Gemini 3.8 Flash, Claude, Gemma | Flash tier built for low latency | Gemini 3.8 Flash $0.75 in, $3.75 out until 2027, then $1.50/$7.50 | Custom training on GPUs or TPUs | Managed on Google Cloud | 1M on Gemini 3.8 Flash | Compare |
 Amazon Bedrock | Closed and open, 100+ models | Claude, GPT-6 Astra, Nova, DeepSeek | Latency-optimized option on some models | ~20–35% above direct; Claude and GPT at parity | Fine-tuning, Custom Model Import | Managed on AWS, AgentCore | Varies by model | Compare |
 Together AI | Open weights | Kimi K3, GLM 5.3, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, Qwen 3.8 | 0.99s TTFT on DeepSeek V4 Pro | Parity with Fireworks and Baseten | LoRA and full SFT; RL in beta | Serverless, dedicated, GPU clusters | 512K on DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | Compare |
 Fireworks AI | Open weights | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, GLM 5.3, Kimi K3 | 167–174 tok/s on DeepSeek V4 Pro | Fine-tunes served at base price | SFT, DPO, RFT; Training API | Serverless, dedicated GPUs | Full 1M on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, GLM 5.3 | Compare |
 Baseten | Open weights, about a dozen curated | GLM 5.3, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, Kimi K3, gpt-oss 120B | 0.49s TTFT, lowest measured | H100 about $6.50/hr dedicated | Deploy any model with Truss | Model APIs, dedicated, self-host | Varies by model | Compare |
 Groq | Open weights | GPT-OSS 120B, Qwen 3.8 27B | 500–1,000 tok/s | Near the floor on small models | No fine-tuned model hosting | GroqCloud API | Around 131K max | Compare |
 Cerebras | Open weights | GPT-OSS 120B, Qwen 3.8 27B | ~3,000 tok/s on GPT-OSS 120B | $0.35 in, $0.75 out (GPT-OSS 120B) | Unknown | Shared API, dedicated, partners | 131K on GPT-OSS 120B, 128K on Qwen 3.8 27B | Compare |
 DeepInfra | Open weights | DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 3.1 8B | Unknown | From $0.02 per 1M | No managed fine-tuning | Shared API, no contracts | 1M on DeepSeek V4 Pro | Compare |
 Hugging Face Inference Providers | Open weights | GLM 5.3, Kimi K3, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Routes to fastest provider by default | Provider rates, no markup | N/A | Serverless router; dedicated Endpoints | Up to 1M, provider-dependent | Compare |
 Modal | Bring your own weights | None hosted | ~1s container boot | Per second; H100 $3.95/hr list | Run any training code | Serverless GPU containers | Depends on the model you deploy | Compare |
 Cloudflare Workers AI | Open weights | DeepSeek V4 Pro, GLM 5.3, Kimi K3, Kimi K2.7 Code, gpt-oss 120B | Unknown | $0.011 per 1K Neurons; 10K free daily | BYO LoRA on small models (beta) | Serverless on Cloudflare network | 1M on DeepSeek V4 and Kimi K3; 262K on Kimi K2.6 and K2.7 Code | Compare |
 xAI | Closed | Grok 4.7, Grok 4.20, grok-build | ~54 tok/s on Grok 4.6 | $2 in, $6 out (Grok 4.7); 2x past 200K | Unknown | First-party API | 500K (4.7), 1M (4.20, 4.3) | Compare |
 Mistral AI | Open weights, plus closed Codestral | Mistral Large 4, Medium 3.5, Small 4, Large 3 | Unknown | $0.15–$1.50 in, $0.60–$7.50 out per 1M | Forge (enterprise); fine-tuning API deprecated | API, Azure, Bedrock, Vertex, self-host | 1M (Large 4 preview); 256K on others | Compare |
 DeepSeek | Open weights (MIT) | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | ~209 tok/s on V4.1 Flash | Off-peak hours at half price | Open weights to fine-tune | First-party API, Hugging Face weights | 1M, 384K max output | Compare |
 Moonshot AI | Open weights, custom license | Kimi K3, Kimi K2.8 Preview | ~33 tok/s on Kimi K3 | $3 in, $15 out (Kimi K3) | Open weights to fine-tune | API, Kimi Code, OpenRouter | 1M | Compare |
 Z.ai | Open weights (GLM-5.3 License; MIT on Flash and older) | GLM-5.3, GLM-5.3-Flash | ~80 tok/s on GLM-5.3 | $1.40 in, $4.40 out (GLM-5.3); free Flash tier | Open weights; GLM-5.3 License adds review for large hosts | API, GLM Coding Plan | 1M (GLM-5.3) | Compare |
 Alibaba Cloud | Open weights incl. Max (custom license) | Qwen 3.8-Max, Qwen 3.7-Max | ~40 tok/s on Qwen 3.8-Max | $2 in, $6 out international | No fine-tuning on hosted Max | Model Studio on Alibaba Cloud | 1M (Qwen 3.8-Max) | Compare |
 Meta | Closed API; open Muse Glimmer | Muse Spark 1.3, Muse Glimmer | ~145–233 tok/s on Muse Spark 1.3 | $1.25 in, $4.25 out; Contributor tier cheaper | Open Muse Glimmer weights to fine-tune | Meta Model API (preview) | 1M | Compare |
 Cohere | Closed, plus open Command A+ | Command A+, Command A, Embed 5, Rerank 4 | 375 tok/s on Command A+ W4A4, per Cohere | $0.0375–$2.50 in, $0.15–$10 out per 1M | Enterprise fine-tuning, incl. private | API, Bedrock, Azure, OCI, VPC, on-prem | 256K on Command A; 128K on A+ | Compare |
 SambaNova | Open weights | MiniMax M3, MiniMax M2.7, GPT-OSS 120B | ~800 tok/s on MiniMax M2.7 (SN50, SemiAnalysis) | $0.22 in, $0.59 out (GPT-OSS 120B) | Unknown | SambaCloud, racks for neoclouds | Up to 1M (MiniMax M3, preview) | Compare |
 Nebius | Open weights, 60+ models | DeepSeek V4 Pro, Kimi K3, MiniMax M3, GLM | Among top hosts on throughput | From $0.06 per 1M input | Serve uploaded fine-tunes | Token Factory, dedicated, raw GPUs | Varies by model | Compare |
 Crusoe | Open weights | DeepSeek V4, GLM 5.3, Kimi K2.6, Nemotron 3 | Up to 9.9x faster TTFT vs vLLM (vendor claim) | $0.05–$1.74 in, $0.20–$4.40 out per 1M | Serverless LoRA fine-tuning | Serverless, self-serve and tailored dedicated, raw GPUs | Varies by model; cluster-wide KV cache | Compare |
 fal | Hosted media models | FLUX, Kling, Seedream | Cold starts on less popular endpoints | Per image, per video second, GPU time | LoRA training endpoints | Hosted API, serverless GPUs | Not applicable | Compare |
 Novita AI | Open weights | DeepSeek V4 Pro, Gemma 4 | ~36 tok/s on DeepSeek V4 Pro | From $0.02 per 1M; batch 50% off | Hot-swappable LoRA adapters | Serverless, GPU cloud, dedicated | Full 1M on DeepSeek V4 Pro | Compare |
 Venice | Open weights, plus proxied closed models | GLM 5.3, Kimi K3, DeepSeek V4 Pro | Unknown | $0.06–$12 in, $0.28–$60 out per 1M; DIEM staking | Unknown | Serverless API, consumer app | 1M on most current models | Compare |
 Parasail | Any Hugging Face model | Kimi K3, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, GLM-5.3, MiniMax M3 | 600ms p99 real-time budget | Per-parameter rates; batch 50% off | Private Hugging Face repos | Serverless, elastic, dedicated, batch | Varies by model | Compare |
 Inference.net | Open, closed and custom | Schematron, ClipTagger, customer fine-tunes | Batch windows of 24h to 7 days | Free pay-as-you-go; Growth $250/mo; B200 $9.98/hr | Distill traces into custom models | Batch API, gateway, dedicated GPUs | Varies by model | Compare |
 GMI Cloud | Open and third-party models | DeepSeek V4 Flash, GLM-5.2, Google Veo | Near bare-metal performance | H100 from $2.60/GPU-hr | Unknown | Shared, autoscaling, reserved GPUs | Varies by model | Compare |
| Thinking Machines | Open weights | Inkling, Inkling-Small | Unknown | Per 1M tokens by prefill, sample, train; Inkling $1.00 in, $4.05 out | LoRA SFT and RL via Tinker | Training API, beta serverless (Inkling only) | Inkling up to 1M (256K serverless); Tinker 32K–256K | Compare |
 Sail Research | Open weights | Kimi K2.6, GLM-5.3, GPT-OSS 120B | Low-latency default; slower windows cheaper | 30–85% below other hosts by completion window | Customer LoRA fine-tunes | API plus Sailboxes | Varies by model | Compare |
 Morph | Specialist models | morph-v3-fast, morph-v3-large | 10,500+ tok/s Fast Apply | $0.80 in, $1.20 out (morph-v3-fast) | Fine-tuning offered | OpenAI-compatible API; self-hosted on Enterprise | Unknown | Compare |
 Relace | Specialist models | relace-apply-3, agentic search | ~10,000 tok/s apply | 3x+ cheaper than full rewrites | Unknown | Hosted API or self-hosted | 128K max | Compare |
 TypeSafe AI | Decision models | Jev, jev-1.13 | 70–500ms per call | $0.042 per 1M input tokens; output free | Unknown | Early-access API, also via LiteLLM | 32K | Compare |
 StepFun | Open (Apache 2.0) and API models | Step 5 Preview, Step 3.7 Flash | ~128 tok/s on Step 3.7 Flash | $0.20 in, $1.15 out (Step 3.7 Flash) | Open weights to fine-tune | First-party API, OpenRouter | Up to 1M (Step 5 Preview); 256K on Step 3.7 Flash | Compare |
 Runware | Hosted media models | Seedance 2.5, Qwen-Image-3.0 | Unknown | Images from fractions of a cent | Fine-tuned diffusion checkpoints | Unified API, serverless GPUs, bare metal | Not applicable | Compare |
 StreamLake | Proprietary coding models, plus hosted open models | KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5, KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 | Unknown | $0.74 in, $2.96 out (Pro V2.5), or KwaiKAT Coding Plan | Unknown | MaaS API, bare metal | 256K | Compare |
 Wafer | Open weights | GLM-5.3, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | ~176 tok/s on GLM-5.3; 2–2.8x vs stock vLLM or SGLang (vendor) | Per token, prepaid credits | Agent-tuned dedicated deployments | Serverless, dedicated | Up to 1M (GLM-5.3, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash) | Compare |
 RunInfra | Open weights | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B, Qwen 3.8 27B | ~541 tok/s on Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B (vendor); cold starts under 2s | From $0.05 in, $0.15 out; coding plans from $10 a month | Uploads up to 50 GB; auto-quantization | Model APIs, agent-built endpoints | Varies by model | Compare |
 Particle.AI | Open weights | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, GLM 5.3 Flash | ~193 tok/s on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | $0.10 in, $0.40 out (GLM 5.3 Flash) | Unknown | Via Vercel AI Gateway | 1M | Compare |
 Luminal | Small hosted catalog plus bring your own weights | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, Ideogram 4.5 | 36K tok/s on GPT-OSS 120B, 8xH100 (vendor) | $0.1425 in, $0.57 out (DeepSeek V4.1 Flash) | Compiles any PyTorch or HF model | Serverless (early access), on-prem license | Unknown | Compare |
 Infron | Closed and open, 400+ models | DeepSeek, Qwen, Claude, Gemini, GPT | Unknown | Provider rates; 3–5% top-up fee | Custom deployments | Gateway API, dedicated, BYOK | Varies by model | Compare |
 Inception | Closed weights (Mercury dLLMs) | Mercury 2.5, Mercury 2 | 1,100+ tok/s (vendor); ~640 measured | $0.20 in, $0.75 out (Mercury 2.5) | Fine-tuning on request | Serverless API, Bedrock, Azure, private | 260K | Compare |
 Dolphin | Open weights, uncensored fine-tunes | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, Dolphin Mistral 24B | Unknown | $0.01 in, $0.07 out (DeepSeek V4.1 Flash) | Own uncensored fine-tunes | Decentralized serverless API | Unknown | Compare |
Frequently asked questions
What is Anthropic?
Anthropic sells the Claude family of closed models through its own API, Amazon Bedrock, Google Vertex AI and Microsoft Foundry. The public lineup today runs from Claude Fable 5.1 at the top, released September 1, 2026, through Opus 5.5 ($4 in, $20 out) and Sonnet 5.5 ($2 in, $10 out) down to Haiku 5.5. List prices span a hundredfold range, from $10 in and $50 out on Fable to $0.10 in and $0.50 out on Haiku. All four tiers have a 1M token context window. The top three bill it at standard pricing, while Haiku 5.5 charges more past 100K.
What is Anthropic best for?
Agentic coding and code review; Long-running research agents and multi-step enterprise workflows.
How much does Anthropic cost?
Anthropic pricing at a glance: $0.10–$10 in, $0.50–$50 out per 1M. Rates change often, so check Anthropic's pricing page before committing.
How much context does Anthropic support?
Anthropic's long-context support: 1M; Haiku 5.5 costs more past 100K.
What are the downsides of Anthropic?
Fable always thinks, so output tokens per task run high and latency is the slowest in the lineup; Safety classifiers can reroute cybersecurity or biology requests to a lower tier, which surprises some security teams.
What are the best alternatives to Anthropic?
Common alternatives include Subconscious, OpenAI, Google Vertex AI, Amazon Bedrock, Together AI. Each has a head-to-head comparison with Anthropic on this site.
Sources: Best Claude model 2026, Respan, Fable 5 vs Sonnet 5, ofox, Claude Opus 5.5, Anthropic, Claude Haiku 5.5, Anthropic. Pricing and model lineups change often; figures are a snapshot.