Long-running agents deserve better inference.
vs

Subconscious vs OpenScale

Both serve DeepSeek V4.1 Flash to coding agents. OpenScale sells it at a promotional low price per token. Subconscious runs it on a runtime built for agent traces past 200K tokens.

By The Subconscious Team · Updated

Subconscious vs OpenScale: key differences

OpenScale, a Y Combinator-backed API out of Singapore, serves DeepSeek V4.1 Flash at $0.06 in, $0.003 cached and $0.24 out per million tokens under a 50% promotion, at 200+ tokens per second, with a faster tier at about twice the speed for a higher price. It speaks the Anthropic, OpenAI Responses and Chat Completions formats and publishes tested setups for Claude Code, Codex and other agents. Subconscious serves the same model plus GLM 5.3 on a runtime that prunes the KV cache and preserves suffix state. It delivers 2x faster task completion, 50% to 80% lower cost than standard inference and a 5M+ effective context window, and bills processed tokens rather than tokens sent.

OpenScale is a good pick for cheap, short-to-medium agent calls where per-token price is the deciding number. On long coding runs the gap shifts: OpenScale is capped at the model's 1M token window, while Subconscious gets faster and cheaper as traces grow. Subconscious also offers dedicated and on-prem deployments, records no prompts or inputs, and operates from Kendall Square, which can ease US and EU procurement.

What Subconscious and OpenScale do

Subconscious

Subconscious is an MIT CSAIL spinout in Kendall Square that builds inference for long-horizon agents, the workloads where a single trace runs past 200K tokens and often into the millions. Its runtime drops in as a replacement for vLLM or SGLang. Instead of rereading an ever-growing context on every step, it prunes the KV cache and preserves suffix state, and Subconscious co-designs the runtime with post-trained model variants it calls Marathon. Against open models on standard inference, Subconscious delivers 2x faster task completion, delivers a 5M+ effective context window, cuts cost 50% and up to 80%, and scores neutral to 10% better on agentic benchmarks.

Example models: GLM 5.3, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

Full Subconscious profile

OpenScale

OpenScale is a Y Combinator-backed inference API built by LatentSpace and run out of Singapore. It sells open models behind one endpoint that speaks Chat Completions, the OpenAI Responses API and Anthropic Messages, so Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cline, GitHub Copilot, Zed and other coding agents can point at it with a base URL and key. Its public catalog today is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash in two versions, standard and fast, both with a 1M token context window and up to 384K output tokens.

Example models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

Full OpenScale profile

Should you choose Subconscious or OpenScale?

Subconscious

Choose Subconscious for

  • Coding agents past 200K tokens
  • 5M+ effective context
  • Dedicated or on-prem deployment

OpenScale

Choose OpenScale for

  • The lowest per-token price on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
  • Short, cache-heavy agent calls
  • Quick setup in Claude Code or Codex

Subconscious vs OpenScale at a glance

AttributeSubconsciousOpenScale
Model accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Flagship modelsGLM 5.3, DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Speed2x faster task completion200+ tok/s; fast tier ~2x
Price50–80% lower cost; billed on processed tokens$0.06 in, $0.24 out (promo, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash)
CustomizationMarathon post-trained variantsN/A
DeploymentManaged API, dedicated, on-premServerless API
Long context5M+ effective context1M context

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Subconscious and OpenScale?

Both serve DeepSeek V4.1 Flash to coding agents. OpenScale sells it at a promotional low price per token. Subconscious runs it on a runtime built for agent traces past 200K tokens.

When should I choose Subconscious over OpenScale?

Coding agents past 200K tokens; 5M+ effective context; Dedicated or on-prem deployment.

When should I choose OpenScale over Subconscious?

The lowest per-token price on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash; Short, cache-heavy agent calls; Quick setup in Claude Code or Codex.

Is Subconscious or OpenScale cheaper?

Subconscious: 50–80% lower cost; billed on processed tokens. OpenScale: $0.06 in, $0.24 out (promo, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash). The cheaper choice depends on the model and workload.

Which has more context, Subconscious or OpenScale?

Subconscious: 5M+ effective context. OpenScale: 1M context.

Related comparisons

Run your longest agent traces on Subconscious

Point the OpenAI or Anthropic SDK, or the coding agent you already use, at Subconscious. Keep OpenScale for the work it does best and send the long runs to us.