Long-running agents deserve better inference.
vs

Together AI vs Infron

Together AI hosts open models on its own GPUs with fine-tuning. Infron routes across 400+ models from 100+ providers on one key.

By The Subconscious Team · Updated

Together AI vs Infron: key differences

Together runs Kimi K3, DeepSeek V4, GLM 5.2, Qwen 3.8 and more on its own serverless and dedicated infrastructure, with LoRA, full SFT and RL fine-tuning and rentable GPU clusters. Infron is a gateway: one OpenAI-compatible API in front of 400+ models from 100+ providers, at provider rates plus a 3% to 5% fee on credit top-ups, with fallbacks, region pinning and a 99.9% uptime SLA on dedicated throughput.

Together controls its own serving, so latency and features are consistent across its catalog, and it trains models. Infron adds closed models like GPT and Claude, failover across hosts and region pinning, but no training. Teams that fine-tune pick Together; teams that mix many vendors lean Infron.

What Together AI and Infron do

Together AI

Together AI is the broadest open-model platform in the category. One bill covers per-token serverless inference, batch at up to 50% off, provisioned throughput with a 99% SLA, dedicated deployments, raw GPU clusters, managed fine-tuning and code sandboxes for agents. The text catalog runs past thirty open models, including DeepSeek V4, Kimi K3, GLM 5.2, Qwen 3.8 and MiniMax M3, plus image, video, speech and embedding models. Token prices sit at parity with Fireworks and Baseten.

Example models: Kimi K3, DeepSeek V4 Pro

Full Together AI profile

Infron

Infron is a US-based AI gateway and inference platform. One OpenAI-compatible API reaches 400+ models from 100+ providers, including DeepSeek, Qwen, Claude, Gemini and GPT through what Infron calls official partner routes, plus media and search models. Teams set provider preferences and fallbacks, see usage and billing in one place, and can bring their own provider keys at no fee. Lawrence Xu is CEO and co-founder Andrew Zheng is CTO.

Example models: DeepSeek, Qwen, Claude, Gemini, GPT

Full Infron profile

Should you choose Together AI or Infron?

Together AI

Choose Together AI for

  • Fine-tuning and RL on one platform
  • Consistent serving on owned infrastructure
  • Rentable GPU clusters

Infron

Choose Infron for

  • Closed and open models on one key and one bill
  • Automatic failover across providers
  • Region pinning across Asia, Europe and the US

Together AI vs Infron at a glance

AttributeTogether AIInfron
Model accessOpen weightsClosed and open, 400+ models
Flagship modelsKimi K3, DeepSeek V4, GLM 5.2, Qwen 3.8DeepSeek, Qwen, Claude, Gemini, GPT
Speed0.99s TTFT on DeepSeek V4 ProUnknown
PriceParity with Fireworks and BasetenProvider rates; 3–5% top-up fee
CustomizationLoRA and full SFT; RL in betaCustom deployments
DeploymentServerless, dedicated, GPU clustersGateway API, dedicated, BYOK
Long context512K on DeepSeek V4 ProVaries by model

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Together AI and Infron?

Together AI hosts open models on its own GPUs with fine-tuning. Infron routes across 400+ models from 100+ providers on one key.

When should I choose Together AI over Infron?

Fine-tuning and RL on one platform; Consistent serving on owned infrastructure; Rentable GPU clusters.

When should I choose Infron over Together AI?

Closed and open models on one key and one bill; Automatic failover across providers; Region pinning across Asia, Europe and the US.

Is Together AI or Infron cheaper?

Together AI: Parity with Fireworks and Baseten. Infron: Provider rates; 3–5% top-up fee. The cheaper choice depends on the model and workload.

Which has more context, Together AI or Infron?

Together AI: 512K on DeepSeek V4 Pro. Infron: Varies by model.

Related comparisons

Running long-horizon agents?

If your agents run past 200K tokens, compare both against Subconscious. Our inference stack treats a long-horizon trace as the primary workload, so speed, cost, and accuracy hold up deep into the trace.