vs
GMI Cloud vs StreamLake
Two Asia-rooted clouds. StreamLake sells Kuaishou's KAT-Coder models from China; GMI Cloud hosts many providers' models in Taiwan, Thailand and Malaysia.
By The Subconscious Team · Updated
GMI Cloud vs StreamLake: key differences
StreamLake and GMI Cloud both pair model APIs with bare-metal style compute, and both have roots in Asia, but they serve different buyers. StreamLake is Kuaishou's AI cloud, led by its proprietary KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 agentic coding model with per-token or Coding Plan pricing and a Claude-protocol proxy for Claude Code. It targets Chinese internet businesses, keeps data in China and leads its docs with yuan. GMI is a US and APAC GPU cloud on owned NVIDIA hardware, serving 100+ open and third-party models across text, image, video and audio.
For an APAC company that needs data outside mainland China, GMI's facilities in Taiwan, Thailand and Malaysia are the relevant option. For a developer who specifically wants Kuaishou's coding model on a subscription, StreamLake is the direct source. GMI's catalog is broader in modalities, though its LLM list is smaller and less current than the biggest US hosts. StreamLake's is centered on coding.
What GMI Cloud and StreamLake do
GMI Cloud
GMI Cloud is a vertically integrated GPU cloud and inference platform that owns its NVIDIA hardware. It runs Tier-4 data centers in Silicon Valley, Colorado, Taiwan, Thailand and Malaysia, and as an NVIDIA Cloud Partner it gets priority access to H100, H200 and B200 supply. The company pivoted from crypto mining into AI, which gave it experience standing up high-density power and cooling fast. An $82M Series A came from Headline, Wistron and Thai energy group Banpu.
Example models: GLM-4.7-Flash, Google Veo
Full GMI Cloud profileStreamLake
StreamLake is the AI cloud brand of Kuaishou, the Chinese short-video company behind the Kling video models. It sells model-as-a-service inference and bare-metal compute to internet businesses, drawing on the infrastructure Kuaishou built to serve video at massive scale. Its developer site offers APIs, SDKs and integration guides aimed at taking teams from testing to production.
Example models: KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5, KAT-Coder-Air
Full StreamLake profileShould you choose GMI Cloud or StreamLake?
GMI Cloud
Choose GMI Cloud for
- APAC residency outside mainland China
- Multimodal apps combining LLMs with video and audio
- Scaling onto reserved H100 or H200 capacity
StreamLake
Choose StreamLake for
- Agentic coding on KAT-Coder through a subscription
- Running a proprietary coder inside Claude Code
- Chinese businesses wanting domestic MaaS and bare metal
GMI Cloud vs StreamLake at a glance
| Attribute | GMI Cloud | StreamLake |
|---|---|---|
| Model access | Open and third-party models | Proprietary coding models |
| Flagship models | GLM-4.7-Flash, Google Veo | KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5, KAT-Coder-Air |
| Speed | Near bare-metal performance | Unknown |
| Price | $0.07 in, $0.40 out (GLM-4.7-Flash) | Per token or KwaiKAT Coding Plan |
| Customization | Unknown | Unknown |
| Deployment | Shared, autoscaling, reserved GPUs | MaaS API, bare metal |
| Long context | Varies by model | Unknown |
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between GMI Cloud and StreamLake?
Two Asia-rooted clouds. StreamLake sells Kuaishou's KAT-Coder models from China; GMI Cloud hosts many providers' models in Taiwan, Thailand and Malaysia.
When should I choose GMI Cloud over StreamLake?
APAC residency outside mainland China; Multimodal apps combining LLMs with video and audio; Scaling onto reserved H100 or H200 capacity.
When should I choose StreamLake over GMI Cloud?
Agentic coding on KAT-Coder through a subscription; Running a proprietary coder inside Claude Code; Chinese businesses wanting domestic MaaS and bare metal.
Is GMI Cloud or StreamLake cheaper?
GMI Cloud: $0.07 in, $0.40 out (GLM-4.7-Flash). StreamLake: Per token or KwaiKAT Coding Plan. The cheaper choice depends on the model and workload.
Related comparisons
Running long-horizon agents?
If your agents run past 200K tokens, compare both against Subconscious. Our inference stack treats a long-horizon trace as the primary workload, so speed, cost, and accuracy hold up deep into the trace.