Long-running agents deserve better inference.
vs

Thinking Machines vs OpenScale

Thinking Machines trains open models through its Tinker API. OpenScale serves one open model cheaply for coding agents.

By The Subconscious Team · Updated

Thinking Machines vs OpenScale: key differences

Thinking Machines' Tinker runs LoRA SFT and RL loops that teams write themselves, on models from Qwen to Kimi K2.6 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, and its beta serverless API serves the Apache 2.0 Inkling models capped at 256K context there. Checkpoint sampling is scoped to testing. OpenScale serves DeepSeek V4.1 Flash at $0.06 in, $0.003 cached and $0.24 out per million tokens under a 50% promotion, at 200+ tokens per second, with a fast tier at about twice the speed.

Choose Thinking Machines to build a model. Choose OpenScale to call DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cheaply in production behind Claude Code, Codex or another agent.

What Thinking Machines and OpenScale do

Thinking Machines

Thinking Machines Lab is the San Francisco lab Mira Murati, formerly CTO of OpenAI, founded in February 2025, with OpenAI co-founder John Schulman as chief scientist. It raised about $2 billion at a $12 billion valuation in July 2025 in a round led by Andreessen Horowitz, and in March 2026 signed a multi-year Nvidia deal for one gigawatt of Vera Rubin capacity. In September 2026 it signed a $65M-a-year deal with Crusoe to serve Inkling, GLM 5.2 and 5.3 and its fine-tunes on dedicated B200s. Its main developer product is Tinker, an API for post-training open-weight models that launched in October 2025 and is now generally available. Tinker exposes four low-level calls, forward_backward, optim_step, sample and save_state, so teams write their own supervised or reinforcement learning loops while Thinking Machines runs the distributed GPU work. Training uses LoRA adapters rather than full weight updates.

Example models: Inkling, Inkling-Small, Qwen3.5, Kimi K2.6

Full Thinking Machines profile

OpenScale

OpenScale is a Y Combinator-backed inference API built by LatentSpace and run out of Singapore. It sells open models behind one endpoint that speaks Chat Completions, the OpenAI Responses API and Anthropic Messages, so Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cline, GitHub Copilot, Zed and other coding agents can point at it with a base URL and key. Its public catalog today is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash in two versions, standard and fast, both with a 1M token context window and up to 384K output tokens.

Example models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

Full OpenScale profile

Should you choose Thinking Machines or OpenScale?

Thinking Machines

Choose Thinking Machines for

  • Custom SFT and RL on open models
  • Training large MoE models without a cluster
  • Inkling with image and audio input

OpenScale

Choose OpenScale for

  • Cheap production DeepSeek V4.1 Flash calls
  • Coding agents over Anthropic or OpenAI formats
  • 1M context on the full window

Thinking Machines vs OpenScale at a glance

AttributeThinking MachinesOpenScale
Model accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Flagship modelsInkling, Inkling-SmallDeepSeek V4.1 Flash
SpeedUnknown200+ tok/s; fast tier ~2x
PricePer 1M tokens by prefill, sample, train; Inkling $1.00 in, $4.05 out$0.06 in, $0.24 out (promo, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash)
CustomizationLoRA SFT and RL via TinkerN/A
DeploymentTraining API, beta serverless (Inkling only)Serverless API
Long contextInkling up to 1M (256K serverless); Tinker 32K–256K1M context

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Thinking Machines and OpenScale?

Thinking Machines trains open models through its Tinker API. OpenScale serves one open model cheaply for coding agents.

When should I choose Thinking Machines over OpenScale?

Custom SFT and RL on open models; Training large MoE models without a cluster; Inkling with image and audio input.

When should I choose OpenScale over Thinking Machines?

Cheap production DeepSeek V4.1 Flash calls; Coding agents over Anthropic or OpenAI formats; 1M context on the full window.

Is Thinking Machines or OpenScale cheaper?

Thinking Machines: Per 1M tokens by prefill, sample, train; Inkling $1.00 in, $4.05 out. OpenScale: $0.06 in, $0.24 out (promo, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash). The cheaper choice depends on the model and workload.

Which has more context, Thinking Machines or OpenScale?

Thinking Machines: Inkling up to 1M (256K serverless); Tinker 32K–256K. OpenScale: 1M context.

Related comparisons

Running long-horizon agents?

If your agents run past 200K tokens, compare both against Subconscious. Our inference stack treats a long-horizon trace as the primary workload, so speed, cost, and accuracy hold up deep into the trace.