vs
Nebius vs RunInfra
RunInfra offers cheap coding plans and an agent that builds tuned endpoints; Nebius offers a broad catalog, EU placement and rack-scale GPUs.
By The Subconscious Team · Updated
Nebius vs RunInfra: key differences
RunInfra is a 2026 startup with two products. Its Model APIs serve a small curated library, including Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B and Qwen 3.8 27B, behind one key that works with OpenAI and Anthropic SDKs, and coding plans start at $10 a month for Claude Code, Codex and similar tools. Its second product is an agent that takes a plain-English request, benchmarks models across GPUs from L4 to B200, searches quantized variants and ships an endpoint that scales to zero with cold starts under two seconds. Nebius is a mature cloud with 60+ open models, dedicated endpoints under a 99.9% SLA and raw GPUs up to GB300 racks.
The trade-off is automation versus scale and track record. RunInfra suits a small team that wants a tuned open model or a Whisper-to-LLM-to-TTS voice pipeline without ML ops staff. Its hosted library centers on mid-size models and it has little independent benchmarking. Nebius suits teams that need a wider catalog, measured throughput, in-region EU placement, and room to grow into training on large clusters.
What Nebius and RunInfra do
Nebius
Nebius is an Amsterdam-headquartered AI cloud and the strongest European alternative to the US hyperscalers. It sells raw NVIDIA GPU compute, from H100s at $2.15 an hour preemptible up to GB300 NVL72 racks, and it has begun adding Vera Rubin. Hyperscale buyers back it: a Microsoft capacity deal worth about $17.4B in September 2025, then a Meta agreement worth up to about $27B in March 2026.
Example models: DeepSeek V3, GPT-OSS
Full Nebius profileRunInfra
RunInfra pitches open models built for agents, with two ways in. Its hosted Model APIs serve a small curated library, including Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B, Qwen 3.8 27B and Ornith 1.5 35B, behind one key that works with both the OpenAI and Anthropic SDKs. Cached context bills at a discount. Coding plans start at $10 a month with limits that reset every five hours and every week, and they plug into Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cline, Aider and dozens of other agent CLIs.
Example models: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B, Qwen 3.8 27B
Full RunInfra profileShould you choose Nebius or RunInfra?
Nebius
Choose Nebius for
- A 60+ model open catalog including DeepSeek, Kimi and GLM
- EU-resident inference with a published SLA
- Growing into large-scale GPU training
RunInfra
Choose RunInfra for
- A $10-a-month coding plan for agent CLIs
- Auto-benchmarked, auto-quantized endpoints for teams without ML ops
- Voice pipelines chaining speech, LLM and TTS models
Nebius vs RunInfra at a glance
| Attribute | Nebius | RunInfra |
|---|---|---|
| Model access | Open weights, 60+ models | Open weights |
| Flagship models | DeepSeek, Qwen, GLM, Kimi, GPT-OSS | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B, Qwen 3.8 27B |
| Speed | Among top hosts on throughput | Cold starts under 2s |
| Price | From $0.06 per 1M input | Coding plans from $10 a month |
| Customization | Serve uploaded fine-tunes | Uploads up to 50 GB; auto-quantization |
| Deployment | Token Factory, dedicated, raw GPUs | Model APIs, agent-built endpoints |
| Long context | Varies by model | Varies by model |
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Nebius and RunInfra?
RunInfra offers cheap coding plans and an agent that builds tuned endpoints; Nebius offers a broad catalog, EU placement and rack-scale GPUs.
When should I choose Nebius over RunInfra?
A 60+ model open catalog including DeepSeek, Kimi and GLM; EU-resident inference with a published SLA; Growing into large-scale GPU training.
When should I choose RunInfra over Nebius?
A $10-a-month coding plan for agent CLIs; Auto-benchmarked, auto-quantized endpoints for teams without ML ops; Voice pipelines chaining speech, LLM and TTS models.
Is Nebius or RunInfra cheaper?
Nebius: From $0.06 per 1M input. RunInfra: Coding plans from $10 a month. The cheaper choice depends on the model and workload.
Which has more context, Nebius or RunInfra?
Nebius: Varies by model. RunInfra: Varies by model.
Related comparisons
Running long-horizon agents?
If your agents run past 200K tokens, compare both against Subconscious. Our inference stack treats a long-horizon trace as the primary workload, so speed, cost, and accuracy hold up deep into the trace.